[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYrFOZT+6bNTfP+t@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 20:00:09 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/7] static_call: rename EXPORT_ macros to be more
self-explanatory
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 05:45:48PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> So let's rename these macros to
>
> EXPORT_STATIC_CALL -> EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_FOR_UPDATE
> EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_TRAMP -> EXPORT_STATIC_CALL
>
Ok, let's pain this shed a bit.
How about:
EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_RW
EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_RO
respectively. OR.. alternatively, have both:
EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_KEY
EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_TRAMP
and those that want to export both get to use both.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists