[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYdrm_YnwvxjqLBrJfOF07_nDyu1g0xggRMJ9_x2S+LJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 21:07:44 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
gerg@...ux-m68k.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
dalias@...c.org, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] gpiolib: coldfire: remove custom asm/gpio.h
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:05 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Now that coldfire is the only user of a custom asm/gpio.h, it seems
> better to remove this as well, and have the same interface everywhere.
>
> For the gpio_get_value()/gpio_set_value()/gpio_to_irq(), gpio_cansleep()
> functions, the custom version is only a micro-optimization to inline the
> function for constant GPIO numbers. However, in the coldfire defconfigs,
> I was unable to find a single instance where this micro-optimization
> was even used, so to my best knowledge removing this has no downsides.
>
> The custom gpio_request_one() function is even less useful, as it is
> guarded by an #ifdef that is never true.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists