[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYrmselghIy+qtn8@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 22:22:57 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 7/8] net: dsa: qca8k: add LEDs support
> +static int
> +qca8k_parse_netdev(unsigned long rules, u32 *offload_trigger, u32 *mask)
This is a rather oddly named function, given that it is not actually
passed a netdev. netdev has a very well defined meaning in the network
stack, struct net_device.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists