linux-kernel - Re:Re: [PATCH v3] Fix WWAN device disabled issue after S3 deep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:06:21 +0800 (CST)
From:   "Slark Xiao" <slark_xiao@....com>
To:     "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     hmh@....eng.br, mgross@...ux.intel.com, markpearson@...ovo.com,
        njoshi1@...ovo.com, ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.or, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH v3] Fix WWAN device disabled issue after S3 deep



At 2021-11-08 22:32:56, "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 11/8/21 07:06, Slark Xiao wrote:
>> When WWAN device wake from S3 deep, under thinkpad platform,
>> WWAN would be disabled. This disable status could be checked
>> by command 'nmcli r wwan' or 'rfkill list'.
>> 
>> Issue analysis as below:
>>   When host resume from S3 deep, thinkpad_acpi driver would
>> call hotkey_resume() function. Finnaly, it will use
>> wan_get_status to check the current status of WWAN device.
>> During this resume progress, wan_get_status would always
>> return off even WWAN boot up completely.
>>   In patch V2, Hans said 'sw_state should be unchanged
>> after a suspend/resume. It's better to drop the
>> tpacpi_rfk_update_swstate call all together from the
>> resume path'.
>>   And it's confimed by Lenovo that GWAN is no longer
>>  available from WHL generation because the design does not
>>  match with current pin control.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Slark Xiao <slark_xiao@....com>
>
>Thanks, patch looks good to me:
>
>Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>
>I will merge this once 5.16-rc1 is out.
>
>Regards,
>
>Hans
Hi Hans,
   Thanks for that!

Regards,
Slark
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 12 ------------
>>  1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>> index 50ff04c84650..f1cbd27282e1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
>> @@ -1178,15 +1178,6 @@ static int tpacpi_rfk_update_swstate(const struct tpacpi_rfk *tp_rfk)
>>  	return status;
>>  }
>>  
>> -/* Query FW and update rfkill sw state for all rfkill switches */
>> -static void tpacpi_rfk_update_swstate_all(void)
>> -{
>> -	unsigned int i;
>> -
>> -	for (i = 0; i < TPACPI_RFK_SW_MAX; i++)
>> -		tpacpi_rfk_update_swstate(tpacpi_rfkill_switches[i]);
>> -}
>> -
>>  /*
>>   * Sync the HW-blocking state of all rfkill switches,
>>   * do notice it causes the rfkill core to schedule uevents
>> @@ -3129,9 +3120,6 @@ static void tpacpi_send_radiosw_update(void)
>>  	if (wlsw == TPACPI_RFK_RADIO_OFF)
>>  		tpacpi_rfk_update_hwblock_state(true);
>>  
>> -	/* Sync sw blocking state */
>> -	tpacpi_rfk_update_swstate_all();
>> -
>>  	/* Sync hw blocking state last if it is hw-unblocked */
>>  	if (wlsw == TPACPI_RFK_RADIO_ON)
>>  		tpacpi_rfk_update_hwblock_state(false);
>>