[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYpLiWCDBIOj4nvz@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:20:57 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Vineeth Pillai <vineethrp@...il.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@...ux.dev>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/core: forced idle accounting
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 01:34:28PM -0700, Josh Don wrote:
> @@ -280,6 +288,8 @@ static void __sched_core_flip(bool enabled)
> for_each_cpu(t, smt_mask)
> cpu_rq(t)->core_enabled = enabled;
>
> + cpu_rq(cpu)->core->core_forceidle_start = 0;
> +
> sched_core_unlock(cpu, &flags);
>
> cpumask_andnot(&sched_core_mask, &sched_core_mask, smt_mask);
Not specific to this patch, but perhaps we should do better here and
explicitly initialize more state...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists