[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211109103936.2wjvvwhihhfqjfot@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:39:36 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Martin Kaistra <martin.kaistra@...utronix.de>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Add PTP support for BCM53128 switch
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:50:02AM +0100, Martin Kaistra wrote:
> Ideally, for the B53=m case, I would have liked to include the PTP
> support in the b53_module itself, however I couldn't find a way to do
> that without renaming either the common source file or the module, which
> I didn't want to do.
>
> Instead, b53_ptp will be allowed as a loadable module, but only if
> b53_common is also a module, otherwise it will be built-in.
Does this not work?
obj-$(CONFIG_B53) += b53_common.o
ifdef CONFIG_B53_PTP
b53_common-objs += b53_ptp.o
endif
(haven't tried though)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists