[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5af799c3-5f39-9792-225e-1957c3da7b07@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 13:26:49 +0000
From: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf arm-spe: Snapshot mode test
Hi James, Leo,
Thank you for testing the patch.
On 02/11/2021 15:37, James Clark wrote:
> [...]
> Ok, it seems like I was relying on buggy dash behaviour for my original change. Even with this:
>
> if [[ "$1" == "int" ]]; then
> kill -SIGINT $$
> fi
> if [[ "$1" == "term" ]]; then
> kill -SIGTERM $$
> fi
>
> it still doesn't allow you to break out of running it in a while loop. This is only because of
> the exit code, rather than any kind of signal propagation. Actually it's possible to stop it
> with Ctrl-\ rather than Ctrl-C, and that doesn't require any extra handling in the script.
>
> For that reason I'm happy to go with Leo's original suggestion when I first added this which was
> to not have any extra kill at all.
Thanks for debugging the issue, I think I will consider this fix in the
re-submission.
Thanks,
German
>
> Another fix could be this, but I'm not too keen on it because I don't think any other tests behave
> like this:
>
> [ "$1" = "int" ] || exit 1
> [ "$1" = "term" ] || exit 1
>
>>>> + exit $glb_err
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +trap cleanup_files exit term int
>>>> +
>>>> +arm_spe_report() {
>>>> + if [ $2 != 0 ]; then
>>>> + echo "$1: FAIL"
>>>> + glb_err=$2
>>>> + else
>>>> + echo "$1: PASS"
>>>> + fi
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +perf_script_samples() {
>>>> + echo "Looking at perf.data file for dumping samples:"
>>>> +
>>>> + # from arm-spe.c/arm_spe_synth_events()
>>>> + events="(ld1-miss|ld1-access|llc-miss|lld-access|tlb-miss|tlb-access|branch-miss|remote-access|memory)"
>>>> +
>>>> + # Below is an example of the samples dumping:
>>>> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 l1d-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so)
>>>> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 tlb-access: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so)
>>>> + # dd 3048 [002] 1 memory: ffffaa64999c __GI___libc_write+0x3c (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so)
>>>> + perf script -F,-time -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \
>>>> + egrep " +$1 +[0-9]+ .* +${events}:(.*:)? +" > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +perf_report_samples() {
>>>> + echo "Looking at perf.data file for reporting samples:"
>>>> +
>>>> + # Below is an example of the samples reporting:
>>>> + # 73.04% 73.04% dd libc-2.27.so [.] _dl_addr
>>>> + # 7.71% 7.71% dd libc-2.27.so [.] getenv
>>>> + # 2.59% 2.59% dd ld-2.27.so [.] strcmp
>>>> + perf report --stdio -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \
>>>> + egrep " +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% +$1 " > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +arm_spe_snapshot_test() {
>>>> + echo "Recording trace with snapshot mode $perfdata"
>>>> + perf record -o ${perfdata} -e arm_spe// -S \
>>>> + -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 &
>>>> + PERFPID=$!
>>>> +
>>>> + # Wait for perf program
>>>> + sleep 1
>>>> +
>>>> + # Send signal to snapshot trace data
>>>> + kill -USR2 $PERFPID
>>>> +
>>>> + # Stop perf program
>>>> + kill $PERFPID
>>>> + wait $PERFPID
>>>> +
>>>> + perf_script_samples dd &&
>>>> + perf_report_samples dd
>>>> +
>>>> + err=$?
>>>> + arm_spe_report "SPE snapshot testing" $err
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +arm_spe_snapshot_test
>>>> +exit $glb_err
>>>> \ No newline at end of file
>>>> --
>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists