[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABayD+dM8OafXkw6_Af17uvthnNG+k3majitc3uGwsm+Lr8DAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 11:38:39 -0800
From: Steve Rutherford <srutherford@...gle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "Kalra, Ashish" <Ashish.Kalra@....com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
"dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com" <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
"tobin@...ux.ibm.com" <tobin@...ux.ibm.com>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"dgilbert@...hat.com" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] x86/kvm: Add AMD SEV specific Hypercall3
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 4:44 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 07:26:32PM +0000, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
> > Yes that’s what I mentioned to Boris.
>
> Right, and as far as I'm concerned, the x86 bits look ok to me and I'm
> fine with this going through the kvm tree.
>
> There will be a conflict with this:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210928191009.32551-1-bp@alien8.de
>
> resulting in:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c: In function ‘setup_efi_kvm_sev_migration’:
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c:563:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sev_active’; did you mean ‘cpu_active’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 563 | if (!sev_active() ||
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> | cpu_active
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:277: arch/x86/kernel/kvm.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:540: arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
> make: *** [Makefile:1868: arch/x86] Error 2
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
> but Paolo and I will figure out what to do - I'll likely have a separate
> branch out which he can merge and that sev_active() will need to be
> converted to
>
> if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT))
>
> which is trivial.
>
> Thx.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Hey All,
Bumping this thread again, since I believe these patches are good to go.
Let me know if there is anything I can do to help here,
Thanks,
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists