linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: power: Add description about new callback for EM registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hf-ZG9RTpoyYhzZSLhy3HxcHDGgvfibPnb3oubx4cfNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Nov 2021 21:28:35 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: power: Add description about new
 callback for EM registration

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:38 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
>
> On 11/2/21 6:01 PM, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> > The Energy Model (EM) registration for CPUs should now be done using
> > a dedicated callback added recently into CPUFreq framework and drivers.
> >
> > Commit c17495b01b72 ("cpufreq: Add callback to register with energy model")
> >
> > The callback guaranties that the EM registration is called at the right
> > time during driver setup. To avoid mistakes update the documentation
> > to align with the existing code implementation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
> > ---
> >   Documentation/power/energy-model.rst | 31 ++++++++++++++--------------
> >   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
>
>
> Gentle ping. Could you have a look at these documentation
> two patches and maybe pick them, please?
> They are trying to solve some confusion discussed with our partners
> recently.

Both applied as 5.16-rc material now, thanks!