lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:29:54 -0800
From:   Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>,
        Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@...il.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
        Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
        Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@...wei.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: [RFC 03/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor flush and free up when zapping under
 MMU write lock

When zapping a GFN range under the MMU write lock, there is no need to
flush the TLBs for every zap. Instead, follow the lead of the Legacy MMU
can collect disconnected sps to be freed after a flush at the end of
the routine.


Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 5b31d046df78..a448f0f2d993 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -623,10 +623,9 @@ static inline bool tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
  */
 static inline void __tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 				      u64 new_spte, bool record_acc_track,
-				      bool record_dirty_log)
+				      bool record_dirty_log,
+				      struct list_head *disconnected_sps)
 {
-	LIST_HEAD(disconnected_sps);
-
 	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
 	/*
@@ -641,7 +640,7 @@ static inline void __tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 	WRITE_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep), new_spte);
 
 	__handle_changed_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->gfn, iter->old_spte,
-			      new_spte, iter->level, false, &disconnected_sps);
+			      new_spte, iter->level, false, disconnected_sps);
 	if (record_acc_track)
 		handle_changed_spte_acc_track(iter->old_spte, new_spte,
 					      iter->level);
@@ -649,28 +648,32 @@ static inline void __tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 		handle_changed_spte_dirty_log(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->gfn,
 					      iter->old_spte, new_spte,
 					      iter->level);
+}
 
-	handle_disconnected_sps(kvm, &disconnected_sps);
+static inline void tdp_mmu_zap_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
+				    struct list_head *disconnected_sps)
+{
+	__tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, 0, true, true, disconnected_sps);
 }
 
 static inline void tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 				    u64 new_spte)
 {
-	__tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte, true, true);
+	__tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte, true, true, NULL);
 }
 
 static inline void tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_acc_track(struct kvm *kvm,
 						 struct tdp_iter *iter,
 						 u64 new_spte)
 {
-	__tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte, false, true);
+	__tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte, false, true, NULL);
 }
 
 static inline void tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
 						 struct tdp_iter *iter,
 						 u64 new_spte)
 {
-	__tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte, true, false);
+	__tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte, true, false, NULL);
 }
 
 #define tdp_root_for_each_pte(_iter, _root, _start, _end) \
@@ -757,6 +760,7 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 	gfn_t max_gfn_host = 1ULL << (shadow_phys_bits - PAGE_SHIFT);
 	bool zap_all = (start == 0 && end >= max_gfn_host);
 	struct tdp_iter iter;
+	LIST_HEAD(disconnected_sps);
 
 	/*
 	 * No need to try to step down in the iterator when zapping all SPTEs,
@@ -799,7 +803,7 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 			continue;
 
 		if (!shared) {
-			tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
+			tdp_mmu_zap_spte(kvm, &iter, &disconnected_sps);
 			flush = true;
 		} else if (!tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter)) {
 			/*
@@ -811,6 +815,12 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (!list_empty(&disconnected_sps)) {
+		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+		handle_disconnected_sps(kvm, &disconnected_sps);
+		flush = false;
+	}
+
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return flush;
 }
-- 
2.34.0.rc0.344.g81b53c2807-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ