lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYuOB9VytsFiDox2@apples.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 10 Nov 2021 10:16:55 +0100
From:   Klaus Jensen <its@...elevant.dk>
To:     Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
Cc:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: fix write zeroes pi

On Nov 10 06:10, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> Klaus,
> 
> On 11/4/2021 11:16 AM, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@...sung.com>
> > 
> > Write Zeroes sets PRACT when block integrity is enabled (as it should),
> > but neglects to also set the reftag which is expected by reads. This
> > causes protection errors on reads.
> > 
> > Fix this by setting the reftag for type 1 and 2 (for type 3, reads will
> > not check the reftag).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@...sung.com>
> 
> Patch looks good to me but did you get a chance to test on
> multiple non-QEMU controllers ?
> 

Hi Chaitanya,

No, I should of course have mentioned that, my apologies. I hit this on
QEMU, so just tested it with that. I didn't have a pi-capable device on
hand.

Feel free to leave this hanging until it can be tested with real
hardware, I think I can dig something up :) However, the spec is pretty
clear that the reftag must be set when using PRACT. It is, however,
kinda strange that the spec also says that PRCHK must be cleared to
zeroes - in my opinion, the device should check the reftag in type 1 and
2 if requested to do so.

A reason this doesnt bug out on real hardware is probably that the
blocks end up deallocated, which bypasses the pi check. However,
currently, in QEMU, if PRACT is set, QEMU will not deallocate the block
in write zeroes. Honestly, I'm not sure why it doesnt. I dont see any
reason for it to not request the QEMU block layer to deallocate... Yours
truly is the idiot that wrote it so I'll consider fixing that :)

The commit that introduced PRACT for write zeroes (commit aaeb7bb061be5
"nvme: set the PRACT bit when using Write Zeroes with T10 PI") also
mentions that without PRACT reads may have validation errors if the
write zeroes didnt deallocate, and QEMU is one of those devices.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ