[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211110145758.16558-3-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:57:58 +0000
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/dbgfs: Fix missed use of damon_dbgfs_lock
DAMON debugfs is supposed to protect dbgfs_ctxs, dbgfs_nr_ctxs, and
dbgfs_dirs using damon_dbgfs_lock. However, some of the code is
accessing the variables without the protection. This commit fixes it by
protecting all such accesses.
Fixes: 75c1c2b53c78 ("mm/damon/dbgfs: support multiple contexts")
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
---
mm/damon/dbgfs.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/damon/dbgfs.c b/mm/damon/dbgfs.c
index 8ce1311ac533..9b520bb4a3e7 100644
--- a/mm/damon/dbgfs.c
+++ b/mm/damon/dbgfs.c
@@ -877,12 +877,14 @@ static ssize_t dbgfs_monitor_on_write(struct file *file,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ mutex_lock(&damon_dbgfs_lock);
if (!strncmp(kbuf, "on", count)) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < dbgfs_nr_ctxs; i++) {
if (damon_targets_empty(dbgfs_ctxs[i])) {
kfree(kbuf);
+ mutex_unlock(&damon_dbgfs_lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
}
@@ -892,6 +894,7 @@ static ssize_t dbgfs_monitor_on_write(struct file *file,
} else {
ret = -EINVAL;
}
+ mutex_unlock(&damon_dbgfs_lock);
if (!ret)
ret = count;
@@ -944,15 +947,16 @@ static int __init __damon_dbgfs_init(void)
static int __init damon_dbgfs_init(void)
{
- int rc;
+ int rc = -ENOMEM;
+ mutex_lock(&damon_dbgfs_lock);
dbgfs_ctxs = kmalloc(sizeof(*dbgfs_ctxs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dbgfs_ctxs)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
dbgfs_ctxs[0] = dbgfs_new_ctx();
if (!dbgfs_ctxs[0]) {
kfree(dbgfs_ctxs);
- return -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
}
dbgfs_nr_ctxs = 1;
@@ -963,6 +967,8 @@ static int __init damon_dbgfs_init(void)
pr_err("%s: dbgfs init failed\n", __func__);
}
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&damon_dbgfs_lock);
return rc;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists