linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] jump_label: refine placement of static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89i+STEwQkEN4hF-gx0WWrL8x5xg=8EDb5O_jf9f3MNVPEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Nov 2021 07:22:37 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] jump_label: refine placement of static_keys

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 2:24 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 09:36, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 05:09:06PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > With CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y, "struct static_key" content is only
> > > used for the control path.
> > >
> > > Marking them __read_mostly is only needed when CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=n.
> > > Otherwise we place them out of the way to increase data locality.
> > >
> > > This patch adds __static_key to centralize this new policy.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c       |  4 ++--
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c         |  2 +-
> > >  include/linux/jump_label.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
> > >  kernel/events/core.c       |  2 +-
> > >  kernel/sched/fair.c        |  2 +-
> > >  net/core/dev.c             |  8 ++++----
> > >  net/netfilter/core.c       |  2 +-
> > >  net/netfilter/x_tables.c   |  2 +-
> > >  8 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > Hurmph, it's a bit cumbersome to always have to add this __static_key
> > attribute to every definition, and in fact you seem to have missed some.
> >
> > Would something like:
> >
> >         typedef struct static_key __static_key static_key_t;
> >
> > work? I forever seem to forget the exact things you can make a typedef
> > do :/
>
> No, that doesn't work. Section placement is an attribute of the symbol
> not of its type. So we'll need to macro'ify this.

Yes, this is also why I chose a short __static_key (initially I was
using something more descriptive but longer)

>
> But I'm not sure I understand why we need different policies here.
> Static keys are inherently __read_mostly (unless they are not writable
> to begin with), so keeping them all together in one place in the
> binary should be sufficient, no?

It is not optimal for CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=n cases.

For instance, networking will prefer having rps_needed / rfs_needed in
the same cache lines than other hot read_mostly stuff,
instead of being far away in other locations.

ffffffff830e0f80 D dev_weight_tx_bias
ffffffff830e0f84 D dev_rx_weight
ffffffff830e0f88 D dev_tx_weight
ffffffff830e0f8c D gro_normal_batch
ffffffff830e0f90 D rps_sock_flow_table
ffffffff830e0f98 D rps_cpu_mask
ffffffff830e0f9c D rps_needed
ffffffff830e0fa0 D rfs_needed
ffffffff830e0fa4 D netdev_flow_limit_table_len
ffffffff830e0fa8 d netif_napi_add.__print_once
ffffffff830e0fac D netdev_unregister_timeout_secs
ffffffff830e0fb0 D ptype_base


When CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y, rps_needed/xps_needed being in a remote
location is a win because it 'saves' 32 bytes than can be used better