linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: Split preemption model selection between DYNAMIC & !DYNAMIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211110164942.GA300656@lothringen>
Date:   Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:49:42 +0100
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc:     Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Split preemption model selection between DYNAMIC
 & !DYNAMIC

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 02:45:45PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 10/11/21 11:24, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > Following Frederic's _STATIC suggestion, I got to the below. The nice thing
> > is if a defconfig picks say PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY and the arch supports
> > PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, then it'll pick PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_BEHAVIOUR. The less nice
> > thing is that we end up selecting PREEMPT_STATIC for PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> > kernels, naming's hard... Maybe _BUILD rather than _STATIC?
> >
> 
> And now without a legacy compatibility layer crud...
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index 2776423a587e..9c7d774ef809 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
>  struct completion;
>  struct user;
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_BUILD
>  
>  extern int __cond_resched(void);
>  # define might_resched() __cond_resched()
> diff --git a/include/linux/vermagic.h b/include/linux/vermagic.h
> index 1eaaa93c37bf..f2b71920024c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vermagic.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vermagic.h
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
>  #else
>  #define MODULE_VERMAGIC_SMP ""
>  #endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_BUILD
>  #define MODULE_VERMAGIC_PREEMPT "preempt "
>  #elif defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
>  #define MODULE_VERMAGIC_PREEMPT "preempt_rt "
> @@ -39,9 +39,9 @@
>  #define MODULE_RANDSTRUCT_PLUGIN
>  #endif
>  
> -#define VERMAGIC_STRING 						\
> +#define VERMAGIC_STRING							\
>  	UTS_RELEASE " "							\
> -	MODULE_VERMAGIC_SMP MODULE_VERMAGIC_PREEMPT 			\
> +	MODULE_VERMAGIC_SMP MODULE_VERMAGIC_PREEMPT			\
>  	MODULE_VERMAGIC_MODULE_UNLOAD MODULE_VERMAGIC_MODVERSIONS	\
>  	MODULE_ARCH_VERMAGIC						\
>  	MODULE_RANDSTRUCT_PLUGIN
> diff --git a/init/Makefile b/init/Makefile
> index 2846113677ee..04eeee12c076 100644
> --- a/init/Makefile
> +++ b/init/Makefile
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ $(obj)/version.o: include/generated/compile.h
>  quiet_cmd_compile.h = CHK     $@
>        cmd_compile.h = \
>  	$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/scripts/mkcompile_h $@	\
> -	"$(UTS_MACHINE)" "$(CONFIG_SMP)" "$(CONFIG_PREEMPT)"	\
> +	"$(UTS_MACHINE)" "$(CONFIG_SMP)" "$(CONFIG_PREEMPT_BUILD)"	\
>  	"$(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)" $(CONFIG_CC_VERSION_TEXT) "$(LD)"
>  
>  include/generated/compile.h: FORCE
> diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> index 60f1bfc3c7b2..ce77f0265660 100644
> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> @@ -1,12 +1,23 @@
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>  
> +config PREEMPT_NONE_BUILD
> +	bool
> +
> +config PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_BUILD
> +	bool
> +
> +config PREEMPT_BUILD
> +	bool
> +	select PREEMPTION
> +	select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK if !ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
> +
>  choice
>  	prompt "Preemption Model"
> -	default PREEMPT_NONE_BEHAVIOUR
> +	default PREEMPT_NONE
>  
> -config PREEMPT_NONE_BEHAVIOUR
> +config PREEMPT_NONE
>  	bool "No Forced Preemption (Server)"
> -	select PREEMPT_NONE if !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> +	select PREEMPT_NONE_BUILD if !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
>  	help
>  	  This is the traditional Linux preemption model, geared towards
>  	  throughput. It will still provide good latencies most of the
> @@ -18,10 +29,10 @@ config PREEMPT_NONE_BEHAVIOUR
>  	  raw processing power of the kernel, irrespective of scheduling
>  	  latencies.
>  
> -config PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_BEHAVIOUR
> +config PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY
>  	bool "Voluntary Kernel Preemption (Desktop)"
>  	depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
> -	select PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY if !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> +	select PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_BUILD if !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
>  	help
>  	  This option reduces the latency of the kernel by adding more
>  	  "explicit preemption points" to the kernel code. These new
> @@ -37,10 +48,10 @@ config PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_BEHAVIOUR
>  
>  	  Select this if you are building a kernel for a desktop system.
>  
> -config PREEMPT_BEHAVIOUR
> +config PREEMPT
>  	bool "Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)"
>  	depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
> -	select PREEMPT
> +	select PREEMPT_BUILD
>  	help
>  	  This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making
>  	  all kernel code (that is not executing in a critical section)

Looks nicer that way!

But don't forget to also update preempt_dynamic_init().