[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00000000000089436205d07229eb@google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:00:25 -0800
From: syzbot <syzbot+63614029dfb79abd4383@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] possible deadlock in __loop_clr_fd (3)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: cb690f5238d7 Merge tag 'for-5.16/drivers-2021-11-09' of gi..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1611368ab00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=9d7259f0deb293aa
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=63614029dfb79abd4383
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+63614029dfb79abd4383@...kaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.15.0-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.1/23454 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880222c2938 ((wq_completion)loop1){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0xe1/0x15b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2815
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88801a7e9360 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x7a/0x1070 drivers/block/loop.c:1106
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #7 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:607 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x12f/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:740
lo_open+0x75/0x120 drivers/block/loop.c:1733
blkdev_get_whole+0x99/0x2d0 block/bdev.c:671
blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x354/0xb50 block/bdev.c:826
blkdev_get_by_dev+0x6b/0x80 block/bdev.c:859
blkdev_open+0x154/0x2e0 block/fops.c:501
do_dentry_open+0x4c8/0x1250 fs/open.c:822
do_open fs/namei.c:3426 [inline]
path_openat+0x1cad/0x2750 fs/namei.c:3559
do_filp_open+0x1aa/0x400 fs/namei.c:3586
do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x4d0 fs/open.c:1212
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1228 [inline]
__do_sys_open fs/open.c:1236 [inline]
__se_sys_open fs/open.c:1232 [inline]
__x64_sys_open+0x119/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1232
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #6 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:607 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x12f/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:740
blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x24e/0xb50 block/bdev.c:819
blkdev_get_by_dev+0x6b/0x80 block/bdev.c:859
swsusp_check+0x97/0x2f0 kernel/power/swap.c:1520
software_resume.part.0+0x102/0x1f0 kernel/power/hibernate.c:979
software_resume kernel/power/hibernate.c:86 [inline]
resume_store+0x161/0x190 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1181
kobj_attr_store+0x50/0x80 lib/kobject.c:856
sysfs_kf_write+0x110/0x160 fs/sysfs/file.c:136
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x342/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:296
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2162 [inline]
new_sync_write+0x429/0x660 fs/read_write.c:503
vfs_write+0x7cd/0xae0 fs/read_write.c:590
ksys_write+0x12d/0x250 fs/read_write.c:643
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #5 (system_transition_mutex/1){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:607 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x12f/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:740
software_resume.part.0+0x19/0x1f0 kernel/power/hibernate.c:934
software_resume kernel/power/hibernate.c:86 [inline]
resume_store+0x161/0x190 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1181
kobj_attr_store+0x50/0x80 lib/kobject.c:856
sysfs_kf_write+0x110/0x160 fs/sysfs/file.c:136
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x342/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:296
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2162 [inline]
new_sync_write+0x429/0x660 fs/read_write.c:503
vfs_write+0x7cd/0xae0 fs/read_write.c:590
ksys_write+0x12d/0x250 fs/read_write.c:643
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #4 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:607 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x12f/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:740
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x287/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:287
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2162 [inline]
do_iter_readv_writev+0x472/0x750 fs/read_write.c:725
do_iter_write+0x188/0x710 fs/read_write.c:851
vfs_iter_write+0x70/0xa0 fs/read_write.c:892
iter_file_splice_write+0x723/0xc70 fs/splice.c:689
do_splice_from fs/splice.c:767 [inline]
do_splice+0xb7e/0x1960 fs/splice.c:1079
__do_splice+0x134/0x250 fs/splice.c:1144
__do_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1350 [inline]
__se_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1332 [inline]
__x64_sys_splice+0x198/0x250 fs/splice.c:1332
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #3 (&pipe->mutex/1){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:607 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x12f/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:740
pipe_lock_nested fs/pipe.c:81 [inline]
pipe_lock+0x5a/0x70 fs/pipe.c:89
iter_file_splice_write+0x183/0xc70 fs/splice.c:635
do_splice_from fs/splice.c:767 [inline]
do_splice+0xb7e/0x1960 fs/splice.c:1079
__do_splice+0x134/0x250 fs/splice.c:1144
__do_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1350 [inline]
__se_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1332 [inline]
__x64_sys_splice+0x198/0x250 fs/splice.c:1332
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
-> #2 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}:
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1810 [inline]
sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1880 [inline]
file_start_write include/linux/fs.h:3009 [inline]
lo_write_bvec drivers/block/loop.c:242 [inline]
lo_write_simple drivers/block/loop.c:265 [inline]
do_req_filebacked drivers/block/loop.c:494 [inline]
loop_handle_cmd drivers/block/loop.c:1857 [inline]
loop_process_work+0x1499/0x1db0 drivers/block/loop.c:1897
process_one_work+0x9b2/0x1690 kernel/workqueue.c:2298
worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2445
kthread+0x405/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:327
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
-> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
process_one_work+0x921/0x1690 kernel/workqueue.c:2274
worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2445
kthread+0x405/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:327
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
-> #0 ((wq_completion)loop1){+.+.}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3063 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3186 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3801 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a07/0x54a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5027
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5637 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5602
flush_workqueue+0x110/0x15b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2818
drain_workqueue+0x1a5/0x3c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2983
destroy_workqueue+0x71/0x800 kernel/workqueue.c:4420
__loop_clr_fd+0x1de/0x1070 drivers/block/loop.c:1124
loop_clr_fd drivers/block/loop.c:1237 [inline]
lo_ioctl+0x398/0x17c0 drivers/block/loop.c:1562
blkdev_ioctl+0x37a/0x800 block/ioctl.c:597
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
(wq_completion)loop1 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
lock(&disk->open_mutex);
lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
lock((wq_completion)loop1);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor.1/23454:
#0: ffff88801a7e9360 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x7a/0x1070 drivers/block/loop.c:1106
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 23454 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.15.0-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2143
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3063 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3186 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3801 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a07/0x54a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5027
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5637 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5602
flush_workqueue+0x110/0x15b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2818
drain_workqueue+0x1a5/0x3c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2983
destroy_workqueue+0x71/0x800 kernel/workqueue.c:4420
__loop_clr_fd+0x1de/0x1070 drivers/block/loop.c:1124
loop_clr_fd drivers/block/loop.c:1237 [inline]
lo_ioctl+0x398/0x17c0 drivers/block/loop.c:1562
blkdev_ioctl+0x37a/0x800 block/ioctl.c:597
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f77a49078a7
Code: 3c 1c 48 f7 d8 49 39 c4 72 b8 e8 04 54 02 00 85 c0 78 bd 48 83 c4 08 4c 89 e0 5b 41 5c c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f77a4f4ed78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f77a4f4ee00 RCX: 00007f77a49078a7
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000004c01 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007f77a4f4ec10
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000032
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000014 R15: 00007f77a4f4ee40
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists