[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYwA5/8Zoq6BT29P@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 19:27:03 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, rafael@...nel.org,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, kuba@...nel.org,
saravanak@...gle.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] device property: Add fwnode_irq_get_byname()
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 10:34:43PM +0530, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 2:23 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 01:38:39AM +0530, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> I wrote this function keeping the device tree in mind. I will have to
> look into ACPI and see how the cases you mentioned can be implemented.
> Let's see how far I can get with understanding the ACPI.
Yeah.
What you need to have is
1) expand fwnode_irq_get() to support ACPI GPIO IRQ resources.
2) provide a simple version of the fwnode_irq_get_by_name() like
if (is_of_node())
return of_...();
return acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get_by();
3) establish understanding about naming for ACPI and
4) extend fwnode_irq_get_by_name() by it
if (is_of_node())
return of_...();
ret = acpi_irq_get_by_name();
if (ret > 0)
return ret;
return acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get_by();
As I mentioned, items 1 and 2 are easy to achieve with currently existing APIs.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists