[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 04:55:30 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors
On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 04:47 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> So I suppose the powerpc spot should remain CONFIG_PREEMPT and become
> CONFIG_PREEMPTION when the RT change gets merged, because that spot is
> about full preemptibility, not a distinct preemption model.
KCSAN needs a little help to be usable by RT, but ditto that spot.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists