[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 16:30:30 -0800
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jue Wang <juew@...gle.com>, Yang Yao <ygyao@...gle.com>,
Joanna Li <joannali@...gle.com>,
Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@...gle.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] hugetlb: Add hugetlb.*.numa_stat file
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 4:08 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 3:01 PM Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> [...]
> >
> > +struct hugetlb_cgroup_per_node {
> > + /* hugetlb usage in pages over all hstates. */
> > + unsigned long usage[HUGE_MAX_HSTATE];
> > +};
> > +
>
> You missed my other question. Why do you think concurrent access to
> this struct is safe?
Oh, very sorry. I'll upload another iteration with a fix!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists