lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 11 Nov 2021 12:47:33 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        oliver.sang@...el.com, lkp@...el.com,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        Michal Miroslaw <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] fs/binfmt_elf: use get_task_comm instead of
 open-coded string copy

On 11.11.21 12:34, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2021-11-11 11:06:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 11.11.21 11:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 08.11.21 09:38, Yafang Shao wrote:
>>>> It is better to use get_task_comm() instead of the open coded string
>>>> copy as we do in other places.
>>>>
>>>> struct elf_prpsinfo is used to dump the task information in userspace
>>>> coredump or kernel vmcore. Below is the verfication of vmcore,
>>>>
>>>> crash> ps
>>>>    PID    PPID  CPU       TASK        ST  %MEM     VSZ    RSS  COMM
>>>>       0      0   0  ffffffff9d21a940  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/0]
>>>>>     0      0   1  ffffa09e40f85e80  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/1]
>>>>>     0      0   2  ffffa09e40f81f80  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/2]
>>>>>     0      0   3  ffffa09e40f83f00  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/3]
>>>>>     0      0   4  ffffa09e40f80000  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/4]
>>>>>     0      0   5  ffffa09e40f89f80  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/5]
>>>>       0      0   6  ffffa09e40f8bf00  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/6]
>>>>>     0      0   7  ffffa09e40f88000  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/7]
>>>>>     0      0   8  ffffa09e40f8de80  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/8]
>>>>>     0      0   9  ffffa09e40f95e80  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/9]
>>>>>     0      0  10  ffffa09e40f91f80  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/10]
>>>>>     0      0  11  ffffa09e40f93f00  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/11]
>>>>>     0      0  12  ffffa09e40f90000  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/12]
>>>>>     0      0  13  ffffa09e40f9bf00  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/13]
>>>>>     0      0  14  ffffa09e40f98000  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/14]
>>>>>     0      0  15  ffffa09e40f9de80  RU   0.0       0      0  [swapper/15]
>>>>
>>>> It works well as expected.
>>>>
>>>> Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
>>>> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
>>>> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
>>>> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
>>>> Cc: Michal Miroslaw <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
>>>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>>>> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>>>> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
>>>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>>>> Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>>>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>>> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  fs/binfmt_elf.c | 2 +-
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
>>>> index a813b70f594e..138956fd4a88 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
>>>> @@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ static int fill_psinfo(struct elf_prpsinfo *psinfo, struct task_struct *p,
>>>>  	SET_UID(psinfo->pr_uid, from_kuid_munged(cred->user_ns, cred->uid));
>>>>  	SET_GID(psinfo->pr_gid, from_kgid_munged(cred->user_ns, cred->gid));
>>>>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>>>> -	strncpy(psinfo->pr_fname, p->comm, sizeof(psinfo->pr_fname));
>>>> +	get_task_comm(psinfo->pr_fname, p);
>>>>  
>>>>  	return 0;
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>
>>> We have a hard-coded "pr_fname[16]" as well, not sure if we want to
>>> adjust that to use TASK_COMM_LEN?
>>
>> But if the intention is to chance TASK_COMM_LEN later, we might want to
>> keep that unchanged.
> 
> It seems that len will not change in the end. Another solution is
> going to be used for the long names, see
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211108084142.4692-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com.

Yes, that's what I recall as well. The I read the patch
subjects+descriptions in this series "make it adopt to task comm size
change" and was slightly confused.

Maybe we should just remove any notion of "task comm size change" from
this series and instead just call it a cleanup.


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ