[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YY0qgUqM3CuDHWgB@google.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 14:36:49 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] KVM: x86: Drop arbitraty KVM_SOFT_MAX_VCPUS
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 11/11/21 14:47, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index ac83d873d65b..91ef1b872b90 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -4137,7 +4137,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> > r = !static_call(kvm_x86_cpu_has_accelerated_tpr)();
> > break;
> > case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS:
> > - r = KVM_SOFT_MAX_VCPUS;
> > + r = num_online_cpus();
I doubt it matters much in practice, but this really should be
r = min(num_online_cpus(), KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
> > break;
> > case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
> > r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists