[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 14:50:26 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/design: Synchronize the definition of enum
perf_hw_id with code
Em Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 05:01:47PM +0800, Like Xu escreveu:
> From: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
>
> We're not surprised that there are tons of Linux users who
> only read the documentation to learn about the kernel.
>
> Let's update the perf part for common hardware events
> since three new *generic* hardware events were added.
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/design.txt | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/design.txt b/tools/perf/design.txt
> index a42fab308ff6..aa8cfeabb743 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/design.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/design.txt
> @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ enum perf_hw_id {
> PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS = 4,
> PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES = 5,
> PERF_COUNT_HW_BUS_CYCLES = 6,
> + PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_FRONTEND = 7,
> + PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND = 8,
> + PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES = 9,
> };
>
> These are standardized types of events that work relatively uniformly
> --
> 2.33.0
--
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists