[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 19:45:02 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
Cc: jgross@...e.com, x86@...nel.org, pv-drivers@...are.com,
Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>,
Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, keerthanak@...are.com,
srivatsab@...are.com, anishs@...are.com, vithampi@...are.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, namit@...are.com, joe@...ches.com,
kuba@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] MAINTAINERS: Update maintainers for paravirt ops
and VMware hypervisor interface
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 07:39:16AM -0800, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 07:50:39AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:08:16PM -0800, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> > > From: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
> > >
> > > Deep has decided to transfer maintainership of the VMware hypervisor
> > > interface to Srivatsa, and the joint-maintainership of paravirt ops in
> > > the Linux kernel to Srivatsa and Alexey. Update the MAINTAINERS file
> > > to reflect this change.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
> > > Acked-by: Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>
> > > Acked-by: Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>
> > > Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> >
> > Why are MAINTAINERS updates needed for stable? That's not normal :(
>
> So that people posting bug-fixes / backports to these subsystems for
> older kernels (stable and LTS releases) will CC the new subsystem
> maintainers.
That's not how stable releases work at all.
> That's why I added CC stable tag only to the first two
> patches which add/replace maintainers and not the third patch which is
> just a cleanup.
Patches for stable kernels need to go into Linus's tree first, and if
you have the MAINTAINERS file updated properly there, then you will be
properly cc:ed. We do not look at the MAINTAINERS file for the older
kernel when sending patches out, it's totally ignored as that was the
snapshot at a point in time, which is usually no longer the true state.
So this would have no affect at all, sorry. That's why I asked if you
all really realized what you were doing here :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists