[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 20:20:10 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
马振华 <mazhenhua@...omi.com>,
mingo <mingo@...hat.com>, will <will@...nel.org>,
"boqun.feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG]locking/rwsem: only clean RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF when already
set
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 02:14:48PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> As for the PHASE_CHANGE name, we have to be consistent in both rwsem and
> mutex. Maybe a follow up patch if you think we should change the
> terminology.
Well, that's exactly the point, they do radically different things.
Having the same name for two different things is confusing.
Anyway, let me go read that patch you sent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists