[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ee991e8-0d32-658a-8a9a-09a7d1d88ee8@gmx.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 11:12:09 +0800
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@....com>
To: cgel.zte@...il.com, clm@...com
Cc: josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chiminghao <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs:btrfs: remove unneeded variable
On 2021/11/12 10:49, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: chiminghao <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
>
> Fix the following coccicheck REVIEW:
> ./fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:299:5-8 REVIEW Unneeded variable
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cm>
> Signed-off-by: chiminghao <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
IIRC the @ret is reserved there as we're not handling the !em case with
error number, nor is the only caller properly handling the possible error.
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent_map.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
> index 5a36add21305..1dcb5486ccb6 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
> @@ -296,7 +296,6 @@ static void try_merge_map(struct extent_map_tree *tree, struct extent_map *em)
> int unpin_extent_cache(struct extent_map_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 len,
> u64 gen)
> {
> - int ret = 0;
> struct extent_map *em;
> bool prealloc = false;
>
> @@ -328,7 +327,7 @@ int unpin_extent_cache(struct extent_map_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 len,
> free_extent_map(em);
> out:
> write_unlock(&tree->lock);
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
>
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists