[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211112075422.3821671-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 02:54:22 -0500
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: move guest_pv_has out of user_access section
When UBSAN is enabled, the code emitted for the call to guest_pv_has
includes a call to __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value. objtool
complains that this call happens with UACCESS enabled; to avoid
the warning, pull the calls to user_access_begin into both arms
of the "if" statement, after the check for guest_pv_has.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index dd7b8b465675..dc7eb5fddfd3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3292,9 +3292,6 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
st = (struct kvm_steal_time __user *)ghc->hva;
- if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
- return;
-
/*
* Doing a TLB flush here, on the guest's behalf, can avoid
* expensive IPIs.
@@ -3303,6 +3300,9 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u8 st_preempted = 0;
int err = -EFAULT;
+ if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
+ return;
+
asm volatile("1: xchgb %0, %2\n"
"xor %1, %1\n"
"2:\n"
@@ -3325,6 +3325,9 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
goto dirty;
} else {
+ if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
+ return;
+
unsafe_put_user(0, &st->preempted, out);
vcpu->arch.st.preempted = 0;
}
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists