linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/21] 5.10.79-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:46:35 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/21] 5.10.79-rc1 review

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 07:45:09PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 1:01 PM Sudip Mukherjee
> <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:43:46PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.79 release.
> > > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Fri, 12 Nov 2021 18:19:54 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > systemd-journal-flush.service failed due to a timeout resulting in a very very
> > slow boot on my test laptop. qemu test on openqa failed due to the same problem.
> 
> Build test:
> mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211104): 63 configs -> no new failure
> arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211104): 105 configs -> no new failure
> arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211104): 3 configs -> no failure
> x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211104): 4 configs -> no failure
> 
> Boot test:
> x86_64: Regression mail sent earlier.  Caused by 8615ff6dd1ac ("mm:
> filemap: check if THP has
> hwpoisoned subpage for PMD page fault").
> 
> arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [1]
> 
> [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/362
> 
> 
> Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>

Will go drop the offending patch, thanks.

greg k-h