[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANCKTBun0MCiH5QWBMQqP+pxAN=+dX=ziB1ga39kdr5CmK=Gfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 13:25:11 -0500
From: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/8] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings for Brcmstb EP
voltage regulators
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 5:17 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 05:14:43PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > Similar to the regulator bindings found in "rockchip-pcie-host.txt", this
> > allows optional regulators to be attached and controlled by the PCIe RC
> > driver. That being said, this driver searches in the DT subnode (the EP
> > node, eg pci-ep@0,0) for the regulator property.
> >
> > The use of a regulator property in the pcie EP subnode such as
> > "vpcie12v-supply" depends on a pending pullreq to the pci-bus.yaml
> > file at
> >
> > https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/63
>
> Can you use a lore URL here? github.com is sort of outside the Linux
> ecosystem and this link is more likely to remain useful if it's to
> something in kernel.org.
Hi Bjorn,
I'm afraid I don't know how or if this github repo transfers
information to Linux. RobH, what should I be doing here?
>
> The subject says what this patch does, but the commit log doesn't.
> It's OK to repeat the subject in the commit log if that's what makes
> the most sense.
Got it.
Thanks,
Jim Quinlan
Broadcom STB
Powered by blists - more mailing lists