linux-kernel - Re: 32bit x86 build broken (was: Re: [GIT PULL] Networking for 5.16-rc1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 13 Nov 2021 09:46:03 +0100
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        NetFilter <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 32bit x86 build broken (was: Re: [GIT PULL] Networking for
 5.16-rc1)

On 12/11/2021 16:04, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-11-12 at 06:33 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 18:48:43 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 5:46 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Rafael, Srinivas, we're getting 32 bit build failures after pulling
>>>> back
>>>> from Linus today.
>>>>
>>>> make[1]: *** [/home/nipa/net/Makefile:1850: drivers] Error 2
>>>> make: *** [Makefile:219: __sub-make] Error 2
>>>> ../drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_mbox.c:
>>>> In function ‘send_mbox_cmd’:
>>>> ../drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_mbox.c:7
>>>> 9:37: error: implicit declaration of function ‘readq’; did you mean
>>>> ‘readl’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>>    79 |                         *cmd_resp = readq((void __iomem *)
>>>> (proc_priv->mmio_base + MBOX_OFFSET_DATA));
>>>>       |                                     ^~~~~
>>>>       |                                     readl  
>>>
>>> Gaah.
>>>
>>> The trivial fix is *probably* just a simple
>>
>> To be sure - are you planning to wait for the fix to come via 
>> the usual path?  We can hold applying new patches to net on the 
>> off chance that you'd apply the fix directly and we can fast 
>> forward again :) 
>>
>> Not that 32bit x86 matters all that much in practice, it's just 
>> for preventing new errors (64b divs, mostly) from sneaking in.
>>
>> I'm guessing Rafeal may be AFK for the independence day weekend.
> He was off, but not sure if he is back. I requested Daniel to send PULL
> request for
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/a22a1eeb-c7a0-74c1-46e2-0a7bada73520@infradead.org/T/

FYI

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d9c8e52ff9e84ff1a406330f9ea4de7c5eb40282


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog