[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wj-yyR1s1LcnTspgpcriyX-nDruzSmEneA2U=bOj9gCuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:20:19 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang for 5.16-rc1
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:36 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavoars@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> This patch has been baking in linux-next for a couple of developement
> cycles, now. So, I think we are pretty much ready to merge it into
> mainline.
Ugh. It's also very ugly.
Wouldn't something like this (TOTALLY UNTESTED!) work and do the right thing?
This seems like a natural for a Kconfig decision.
Also, does -Wimplicit-fallthrough=5 work with clang too? That would
simplify things a bit, and then we could just use a regular boolean
and do
KBUILD_CFLAGS-$(CC_IMPLICIT_FALLTHROUGH) += -Wimplicit-fallthrough=5
in the Makefile, which is more in like with what we do for other
config-time cflags..
Linus
View attachment "patch.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (1537 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists