[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZEXPmTF2NKLOQ9Y@sashalap>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 09:03:42 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jonas Dreßler <verdre@...d.nl>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, amitkarwar@...il.com,
ganapathi017@...il.com, sharvari.harisangam@....com,
huxinming820@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 10/39] mwifiex: Run SET_BSS_MODE when
changing from P2P to STATION vif-type
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:06:19AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 5:18 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: Jonas Dreßler <verdre@...d.nl>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit c2e9666cdffd347460a2b17988db4cfaf2a68fb9 ]
>...
>> This does not fix any particular bug and just "looked right", so there's
>> a small chance it might be a regression.
>
>I won't insist on rejecting this one, but especially given this
>sentence, this doesn't really pass the smell test for -stable
>candidates. It's stuff like this that pushes me a bit toward the camp
>of those who despise the ML-based selection methods here, even though
>it occasionally (or even often) may produce some good.
I have hundreds of examples of patches that claim they are just an
improvement but fix a serious bug :)
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists