[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211114064026.277024-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:40:26 +0800
From: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
To: catalin.marinas@....com
Cc: maz@...nel.org, will@...nel.org, james.morse@....com,
alexandru.elisei@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: remove unneeded comparison
The unsigned expression compared with zero `target < 0' is
unneeded and its result is always false. we can also check the
target's value returned from `kvm_target_cpu' is one of the
KVM_* macros, and these macros are defined greater than or equal
to 0.
Therefore, the comparison code block:
if (target < 0)
return -ENODEV;
is unneeded. We can safely remove it.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index 5ce26bedf23c..1605cb71dd52 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -873,9 +873,6 @@ int kvm_vcpu_preferred_target(struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
{
u32 target = kvm_target_cpu();
- if (target < 0)
- return -ENODEV;
-
memset(init, 0, sizeof(*init));
/*
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists