lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <417a93fd-7581-1d33-1522-31f05ca253b9@kapsi.fi>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:21:39 +0200
From:   Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>
To:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reset: tegra-bpmp: Revert Handle errors in BPMP response

On 11/12/21 1:27 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Commit c045ceb5a145 ("reset: tegra-bpmp: Handle errors in BPMP
> response") fixed an issue in the Tegra BPMP error handling but has
> exposed an issue in the Tegra194 HDA driver and now resetting the
> Tegra194 HDA controller is failing. For now revert the commit
> c045ceb5a145 ("reset: tegra-bpmp: Handle errors in BPMP response")
> while a fix for the Tegra HDA driver is created.
> 
> Fixes: c045ceb5a145 ("reset: tegra-bpmp: Handle errors in BPMP response")
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> ---
>   drivers/reset/tegra/reset-bpmp.c | 9 +--------
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/tegra/reset-bpmp.c b/drivers/reset/tegra/reset-bpmp.c
> index 4c5bba52b105..24d3395964cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/tegra/reset-bpmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/tegra/reset-bpmp.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_reset_common(struct reset_controller_dev *rstc,
>   	struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp = to_tegra_bpmp(rstc);
>   	struct mrq_reset_request request;
>   	struct tegra_bpmp_message msg;
> -	int err;
>   
>   	memset(&request, 0, sizeof(request));
>   	request.cmd = command;
> @@ -31,13 +30,7 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_reset_common(struct reset_controller_dev *rstc,
>   	msg.tx.data = &request;
>   	msg.tx.size = sizeof(request);
>   
> -	err = tegra_bpmp_transfer(bpmp, &msg);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> -	if (msg.rx.ret)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return tegra_bpmp_transfer(bpmp, &msg);
>   }
>   
>   static int tegra_bpmp_reset_module(struct reset_controller_dev *rstc,
> 

Is there some reason the subject and commit message does not follow 
normal revert convention (as done by 'git revert')?

Mikko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ