[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211115165344.242464202@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:55:43 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 018/575] parisc: Fix ptrace check on syscall return
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
commit 8779e05ba8aaffec1829872ef9774a71f44f6580 upstream.
The TIF_XXX flags are stored in the flags field in the thread_info
struct (TI_FLAGS), not in the flags field of the task_struct structure
(TASK_FLAGS).
It seems this bug didn't generate any important side-effects, otherwise it
wouldn't have went unnoticed for 12 years (since v2.6.32).
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Fixes: ecd3d4bc06e48 ("parisc: stop using task->ptrace for {single,block}step flags")
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/entry.S
@@ -1848,7 +1848,7 @@ syscall_restore:
LDREG TI_TASK-THREAD_SZ_ALGN-FRAME_SIZE(%r30),%r1
/* Are we being ptraced? */
- ldw TASK_FLAGS(%r1),%r19
+ LDREG TI_FLAGS-THREAD_SZ_ALGN-FRAME_SIZE(%r30),%r19
ldi _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE_MASK,%r2
and,COND(=) %r19,%r2,%r0
b,n syscall_restore_rfi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists