linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 320/355] mm/zsmalloc.c: close race window between zs_pool_dec_isolated() and zs_unregister

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211115165324.078527932@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:04:04 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Henry Burns <henryburns@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 320/355] mm/zsmalloc.c: close race window between zs_pool_dec_isolated() and zs_unregister_migration()

From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit afe8605ca45424629fdddfd85984b442c763dc47 ]

There is one possible race window between zs_pool_dec_isolated() and
zs_unregister_migration() because wait_for_isolated_drain() checks the
isolated count without holding class->lock and there is no order inside
zs_pool_dec_isolated().  Thus the below race window could be possible:

  zs_pool_dec_isolated		zs_unregister_migration
    check pool->destroying != 0
				  pool->destroying = true;
				  smp_mb();
				  wait_for_isolated_drain()
				    wait for pool->isolated_pages == 0
    atomic_long_dec(&pool->isolated_pages);
    atomic_long_read(&pool->isolated_pages) == 0

Since we observe the pool->destroying (false) before atomic_long_dec()
for pool->isolated_pages, waking pool->migration_wait up is missed.

Fix this by ensure checking pool->destroying happens after the
atomic_long_dec(&pool->isolated_pages).

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210708115027.7557-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: 701d678599d0 ("mm/zsmalloc.c: fix race condition in zs_destroy_pool")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Cc: Henry Burns <henryburns@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 mm/zsmalloc.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index 443b3b1c95818..490e5f3ae614a 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -1835,10 +1835,11 @@ static inline void zs_pool_dec_isolated(struct zs_pool *pool)
 	VM_BUG_ON(atomic_long_read(&pool->isolated_pages) <= 0);
 	atomic_long_dec(&pool->isolated_pages);
 	/*
-	 * There's no possibility of racing, since wait_for_isolated_drain()
-	 * checks the isolated count under &class->lock after enqueuing
-	 * on migration_wait.
+	 * Checking pool->destroying must happen after atomic_long_dec()
+	 * for pool->isolated_pages above. Paired with the smp_mb() in
+	 * zs_unregister_migration().
 	 */
+	smp_mb__after_atomic();
 	if (atomic_long_read(&pool->isolated_pages) == 0 && pool->destroying)
 		wake_up_all(&pool->migration_wait);
 }
-- 
2.33.0