| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20211115165354.974252091@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:00:48 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 323/575] kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group
From: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>
[ Upstream commit 4ef0c5c6b5ba1f38f0ea1cedad0cad722f00c14a ]
There is a small race between copy_process() and sched_fork()
where child->sched_task_group point to an already freed pointer.
parent doing fork() | someone moving the parent
| to another cgroup
-------------------------------+-------------------------------
copy_process()
+ dup_task_struct()<1>
parent move to another cgroup,
and free the old cgroup. <2>
+ sched_fork()
+ __set_task_cpu()<3>
+ task_fork_fair()
+ sched_slice()<4>
In the worst case, this bug can lead to "use-after-free" and
cause panic as shown above:
(1) parent copy its sched_task_group to child at <1>;
(2) someone move the parent to another cgroup and free the old
cgroup at <2>;
(3) the sched_task_group and cfs_rq that belong to the old cgroup
will be accessed at <3> and <4>, which cause a panic:
[] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000000
[] PGD 8000001fa0a86067 P4D 8000001fa0a86067 PUD 2029955067 PMD 0
[] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[] CPU: 7 PID: 648398 Comm: ebizzy Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE --------- - - 4.18.0.x86_64+ #1
[] RIP: 0010:sched_slice+0x84/0xc0
[] Call Trace:
[] task_fork_fair+0x81/0x120
[] sched_fork+0x132/0x240
[] copy_process.part.5+0x675/0x20e0
[] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x63f/0x690
[] _do_fork+0xcd/0x3b0
[] do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x1d0
[] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
[] RIP: 0033:0x7f04418cd7e1
Between cgroup_can_fork() and cgroup_post_fork(), the cgroup
membership and thus sched_task_group can't change. So update child's
sched_task_group at sched_post_fork() and move task_fork() and
__set_task_cpu() (where accees the sched_task_group) from sched_fork()
to sched_post_fork().
Fixes: 8323f26ce342 ("sched: Fix race in task_group")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210915064030.2231-1-zhangqiao22@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/sched/task.h | 3 ++-
kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/core.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/task.h b/include/linux/sched/task.h
index 85fb2f34c59b7..24cacb1ca654d 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/task.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/task.h
@@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ extern asmlinkage void schedule_tail(struct task_struct *prev);
extern void init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu);
extern int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p);
-extern void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p);
+extern void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p,
+ struct kernel_clone_args *kargs);
extern void sched_dead(struct task_struct *p);
void __noreturn do_task_dead(void);
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 3f96400a0ac61..773b44be81f9d 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -2310,7 +2310,7 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
proc_fork_connector(p);
- sched_post_fork(p);
+ sched_post_fork(p, args);
cgroup_post_fork(p, args);
perf_event_fork(p);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index e4551d1736fa3..bc8ff11e60242 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3231,8 +3231,6 @@ static inline void init_schedstats(void) {}
*/
int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
{
- unsigned long flags;
-
__sched_fork(clone_flags, p);
/*
* We mark the process as NEW here. This guarantees that
@@ -3278,24 +3276,6 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
init_entity_runnable_average(&p->se);
- /*
- * The child is not yet in the pid-hash so no cgroup attach races,
- * and the cgroup is pinned to this child due to cgroup_fork()
- * is ran before sched_fork().
- *
- * Silence PROVE_RCU.
- */
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
- rseq_migrate(p);
- /*
- * We're setting the CPU for the first time, we don't migrate,
- * so use __set_task_cpu().
- */
- __set_task_cpu(p, smp_processor_id());
- if (p->sched_class->task_fork)
- p->sched_class->task_fork(p);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_INFO
if (likely(sched_info_on()))
memset(&p->sched_info, 0, sizeof(p->sched_info));
@@ -3311,8 +3291,29 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
return 0;
}
-void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p)
+void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p, struct kernel_clone_args *kargs)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
+ struct task_group *tg;
+#endif
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
+ tg = container_of(kargs->cset->subsys[cpu_cgrp_id],
+ struct task_group, css);
+ p->sched_task_group = autogroup_task_group(p, tg);
+#endif
+ rseq_migrate(p);
+ /*
+ * We're setting the CPU for the first time, we don't migrate,
+ * so use __set_task_cpu().
+ */
+ __set_task_cpu(p, smp_processor_id());
+ if (p->sched_class->task_fork)
+ p->sched_class->task_fork(p);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
+
uclamp_post_fork(p);
}
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists