[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211115165352.638101932@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:59:41 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 256/575] task_stack: Fix end_of_stack() for architectures with upwards-growing stack
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
[ Upstream commit 9cc2fa4f4a92ccc6760d764e7341be46ee8aaaa1 ]
The function end_of_stack() returns a pointer to the last entry of a
stack. For architectures like parisc where the stack grows upwards
return the pointer to the highest address in the stack.
Without this change I faced a crash on parisc, because the stackleak
functionality wrote STACKLEAK_POISON to the lowest address and thus
overwrote the first 4 bytes of the task_struct which included the
TIF_FLAGS.
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/sched/task_stack.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/task_stack.h b/include/linux/sched/task_stack.h
index 2413427e439c7..d10150587d819 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/task_stack.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/task_stack.h
@@ -25,7 +25,11 @@ static inline void *task_stack_page(const struct task_struct *task)
static inline unsigned long *end_of_stack(const struct task_struct *task)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
+ return (unsigned long *)((unsigned long)task->stack + THREAD_SIZE) - 1;
+#else
return task->stack;
+#endif
}
#elif !defined(__HAVE_THREAD_FUNCTIONS)
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists