linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.14 100/849] btrfs: call btrfs_check_rw_degradable only if there is a missing device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211115165423.472744929@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:53:03 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.14 100/849] btrfs: call btrfs_check_rw_degradable only if there is a missing device

From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>

commit 5c78a5e7aa835c4f08a7c90fe02d19f95a776f29 upstream.

In open_ctree() in btrfs_check_rw_degradable() [1], we check each block
group individually if at least the minimum number of devices is available
for that profile. If all the devices are available, then we don't have to
check degradable.

[1]
open_ctree()
::
3559 if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && !btrfs_check_rw_degradable(fs_info, NULL)) {

Also before calling btrfs_check_rw_degradable() in open_ctee() at the
line number shown below [2] we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() and down to
add_missing_dev() to record number of missing devices.

[2]
open_ctree()
::
3454         ret = btrfs_read_chunk_tree(fs_info);

btrfs_read_chunk_tree()
  read_one_chunk() / read_one_dev()
    add_missing_dev()

So, check if there is any missing device before btrfs_check_rw_degradable()
in open_ctree().

Also, with this the mount command could save ~16ms.[3] in the most
common case, that is no device is missing.

[3]
 1) * 16934.96 us | btrfs_check_rw_degradable [btrfs]();

CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3551,7 +3551,8 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block
 		goto fail_sysfs;
 	}
 
-	if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && !btrfs_check_rw_degradable(fs_info, NULL)) {
+	if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && fs_info->fs_devices->missing_devices &&
+	    !btrfs_check_rw_degradable(fs_info, NULL)) {
 		btrfs_warn(fs_info,
 		"writable mount is not allowed due to too many missing devices");
 		goto fail_sysfs;