lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211115165446.028623016@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:04:05 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.14 762/849] arm64: pgtable: make __pte_to_phys/__phys_to_pte_val inline functions

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

[ Upstream commit c7c386fbc20262c1d911c615c65db6a58667d92c ]

gcc warns about undefined behavior the vmalloc code when building
with CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52, when the 'idx++' in the argument to
__phys_to_pte_val() is evaluated twice:

mm/vmalloc.c: In function 'vmap_pfn_apply':
mm/vmalloc.c:2800:58: error: operation on 'data->idx' may be undefined [-Werror=sequence-point]
 2800 |         *pte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(data->pfns[data->idx++], data->prot));
      |                                                 ~~~~~~~~~^~
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-types.h:25:37: note: in definition of macro '__pte'
   25 | #define __pte(x)        ((pte_t) { (x) } )
      |                                     ^
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:80:15: note: in expansion of macro '__phys_to_pte_val'
   80 |         __pte(__phys_to_pte_val((phys_addr_t)(pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT) | pgprot_val(prot))
      |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
mm/vmalloc.c:2800:30: note: in expansion of macro 'pfn_pte'
 2800 |         *pte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(data->pfns[data->idx++], data->prot));
      |                              ^~~~~~~

I have no idea why this never showed up earlier, but the safest
workaround appears to be changing those macros into inline functions
so the arguments get evaluated only once.

Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Fixes: 75387b92635e ("arm64: handle 52-bit physical addresses in page table entries")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211105075414.2553155-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index f09bf5c028919..16e53d2515089 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -67,9 +67,15 @@ extern unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(unsigned long)];
  * page table entry, taking care of 52-bit addresses.
  */
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52
-#define __pte_to_phys(pte)	\
-	((pte_val(pte) & PTE_ADDR_LOW) | ((pte_val(pte) & PTE_ADDR_HIGH) << 36))
-#define __phys_to_pte_val(phys)	(((phys) | ((phys) >> 36)) & PTE_ADDR_MASK)
+static inline phys_addr_t __pte_to_phys(pte_t pte)
+{
+	return (pte_val(pte) & PTE_ADDR_LOW) |
+		((pte_val(pte) & PTE_ADDR_HIGH) << 36);
+}
+static inline pteval_t __phys_to_pte_val(phys_addr_t phys)
+{
+	return (phys | (phys >> 36)) & PTE_ADDR_MASK;
+}
 #else
 #define __pte_to_phys(pte)	(pte_val(pte) & PTE_ADDR_MASK)
 #define __phys_to_pte_val(phys)	(phys)
-- 
2.33.0



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ