linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.15 358/917] mptcp: do not shrink snd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211115165440.889672462@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:57:33 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 358/917] mptcp: do not shrink snd_nxt when recovering

From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>

[ Upstream commit 0d199e4363b482badcedba764e2aceab53a4a10a ]

When recovering after a link failure, snd_nxt should not be set to a
lower value.  Else, update of snd_nxt is broken because:

  msk->snd_nxt += ret; (where ret is number of bytes sent)

assumes that snd_nxt always moves forward.
After reduction, its possible that snd_nxt update gets out of sync:
dfrag we just sent might have had a data sequence number even past
recovery_snd_nxt.

This change factors the common msk state update to a helper
and updates snd_nxt based on the current dfrag data sequence number.

The conditional is required for the recovery phase where we may
re-transmit old dfrags that are before current snd_nxt.

After this change, snd_nxt only moves forward and covers all in-sequence
data that was transmitted.

recovery_snd_nxt is retained to detect when recovery has completed.

Fixes: 1e1d9d6f119c5 ("mptcp: handle pending data on closed subflow")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/mptcp/options.c  |  8 +++-----
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
index f0f22eb4fd5f7..350348f070700 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/options.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
@@ -1019,11 +1019,9 @@ static void ack_update_msk(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 	old_snd_una = msk->snd_una;
 	new_snd_una = mptcp_expand_seq(old_snd_una, mp_opt->data_ack, mp_opt->ack64);
 
-	/* ACK for data not even sent yet and even above recovery bound? Ignore.*/
-	if (unlikely(after64(new_snd_una, snd_nxt))) {
-		if (!msk->recovery || after64(new_snd_una, msk->recovery_snd_nxt))
-			new_snd_una = old_snd_una;
-	}
+	/* ACK for data not even sent yet? Ignore.*/
+	if (unlikely(after64(new_snd_una, snd_nxt)))
+		new_snd_una = old_snd_una;
 
 	new_wnd_end = new_snd_una + tcp_sk(ssk)->snd_wnd;
 
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index d073b21113828..4379d69aead7e 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1505,6 +1505,32 @@ static void mptcp_push_release(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
 	release_sock(ssk);
 }
 
+static void mptcp_update_post_push(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
+				   struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag,
+				   u32 sent)
+{
+	u64 snd_nxt_new = dfrag->data_seq;
+
+	dfrag->already_sent += sent;
+
+	msk->snd_burst -= sent;
+	msk->tx_pending_data -= sent;
+
+	snd_nxt_new += dfrag->already_sent;
+
+	/* snd_nxt_new can be smaller than snd_nxt in case mptcp
+	 * is recovering after a failover. In that event, this re-sends
+	 * old segments.
+	 *
+	 * Thus compute snd_nxt_new candidate based on
+	 * the dfrag->data_seq that was sent and the data
+	 * that has been handed to the subflow for transmission
+	 * and skip update in case it was old dfrag.
+	 */
+	if (likely(after64(snd_nxt_new, msk->snd_nxt)))
+		msk->snd_nxt = snd_nxt_new;
+}
+
 void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
 {
 	struct sock *prev_ssk = NULL, *ssk = NULL;
@@ -1548,12 +1574,10 @@ void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
 			}
 
 			info.sent += ret;
-			dfrag->already_sent += ret;
-			msk->snd_nxt += ret;
-			msk->snd_burst -= ret;
-			msk->tx_pending_data -= ret;
 			copied += ret;
 			len -= ret;
+
+			mptcp_update_post_push(msk, dfrag, ret);
 		}
 		WRITE_ONCE(msk->first_pending, mptcp_send_next(sk));
 	}
@@ -1606,13 +1630,11 @@ static void __mptcp_subflow_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 				goto out;
 
 			info.sent += ret;
-			dfrag->already_sent += ret;
-			msk->snd_nxt += ret;
-			msk->snd_burst -= ret;
-			msk->tx_pending_data -= ret;
 			copied += ret;
 			len -= ret;
 			first = false;
+
+			mptcp_update_post_push(msk, dfrag, ret);
 		}
 		WRITE_ONCE(msk->first_pending, mptcp_send_next(sk));
 	}
@@ -2183,15 +2205,12 @@ bool __mptcp_retransmit_pending_data(struct sock *sk)
 		return false;
 	}
 
-	/* will accept ack for reijected data before re-sending them */
-	if (!msk->recovery || after64(msk->snd_nxt, msk->recovery_snd_nxt))
-		msk->recovery_snd_nxt = msk->snd_nxt;
+	msk->recovery_snd_nxt = msk->snd_nxt;
 	msk->recovery = true;
 	mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
 
 	msk->first_pending = rtx_head;
 	msk->tx_pending_data += msk->snd_nxt - rtx_head->data_seq;
-	msk->snd_nxt = rtx_head->data_seq;
 	msk->snd_burst = 0;
 
 	/* be sure to clear the "sent status" on all re-injected fragments */
-- 
2.33.0