[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211115112000.23693-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 13:20:00 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] PCI: brcmstb: Use BIT() as __GENMASK() is for internal use only
Use BIT() as __GENMASK() is for internal use only. The rationale
of switching to BIT() is to provide better generated code. The
GENMASK() against non-constant numbers may produce an ugly assembler
code. On contrary the BIT() is simply converted to corresponding shift
operation.
Note, it's the only user of __GENMASK() in the kernel outside of its own realm.
Fixes: 3baec684a531 ("PCI: brcmstb: Accommodate MSI for older chips")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
v2: switched to BIT() and elaborated why, hence not included tag
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
index 1fc7bd49a7ad..0c49fc65792c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ static void brcm_msi_remove(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
static void brcm_msi_set_regs(struct brcm_msi *msi)
{
- u32 val = __GENMASK(31, msi->legacy_shift);
+ u32 val = ~(BIT(msi->legacy_shift) - 1);
writel(val, msi->intr_base + MSI_INT_MASK_CLR);
writel(val, msi->intr_base + MSI_INT_CLR);
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists