linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] perf/amd/ibs: Move ibs pmus under perf_sw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7ee6951e-eda1-7872-4158-e3bbb9eb31b7@amd.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:31:21 +0530
From:   Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     kim.phillips@....com, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, santosh.shukla@....com,
        sandipan.das@....com, ravi.bangoria@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf/amd/ibs: Move ibs pmus under perf_sw_context



On 15-Nov-21 4:47 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 03:18:38PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>> Ideally, a pmu which is present in each hw thread belongs to
>> perf_hw_context, but perf_hw_context has limitation of allowing only
>> one pmu (a core pmu) and thus other hw pmus need to use either sw or
>> invalid context which limits pmu functionalities.
>>
>> This is not a new problem. It has been raised in the past, for example,
>> Arm big.LITTLE (same for Intel ADL) and s390 had this issue:
>>
>>   Arm:  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20160425175837.GB3141@leverpostej
>>   s390: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20160606082124.GA30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
>>
>> Arm big.LITTLE (followed by Intel ADL) solved this by allowing multiple
>> (heterogeneous) pmus inside perf_hw_context. It makes sense as they are
>> still registering single pmu for each hw thread.
>>
>> s390 solved it by moving 2nd hw pmu to perf_sw_context, though that 2nd
>> hw pmu is count mode only, i.e. no sampling.
>>
>> AMD IBS also has similar problem. IBS pmu is present in each hw thread.
>> But because of perf_hw_context restriction, currently it belongs to
>> perf_invalid_context and thus important functionalities like per-task
>> profiling is not possible with IBS pmu. Moving it to perf_sw_context
>> will:
>>  - allow per-task monitoring
>>  - allow cgroup wise profiling
>>  - allow grouping of IBS with other pmu events
>>  - disallow multiplexing
>>
>> Please let me know if I missed any major benefit or drawback of
>> perf_sw_context. I'm also not sure how easy it would be to lift
>> perf_hw_context restriction and start allowing more pmus in it.
>>
>> Suggestions?
> 
> Same as I do every time this comes up... this patch is still lingering
> and wanting TLC:
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181010104559.GO5728@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/

Thanks for the pointer Peter. I have looked at the patch and it is quite complex,
altering the very way perf event scheduling works.

I don't dispute that is the right 'fix' for the issue, but do you think adding a
new perf context can help alleviate some of the issues in the interim?

Ravi