[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZJbLol1llm+puDT@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:05:50 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hyun Kwon <hyun.kwon@...inx.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
"open list:TEGRA ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] dmaengine: xilinx_dpdma: stop using slave_id field
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:38:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 12:49 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:21:30AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:14 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:54:00AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > > @@ -1285,11 +1287,13 @@ static int xilinx_dpdma_config(struct dma_chan *dchan,
> > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->lock, flags);
> > > > >
> > > > > /*
> > > > > - * Abuse the slave_id to indicate that the channel is part of a video
> > > > > - * group.
> > > > > + * Abuse the peripheral_config to indicate that the channel is part
> > > >
> > > > Is it still an abuse, or is this now the right way to pass custom data
> > > > to the DMA engine driver ?
> > >
> > > It doesn't make the driver any more portable, but it's now being
> > > more explicit about it. As far as I can tell, this is the best way
> > > to pass data that cannot be expressed through the regular interfaces
> > > in DT and the dmaengine API.
> > >
> > > Ideally there would be a generic way to pass this flag, but I couldn't
> > > figure out what this is actually doing, or whether there is a better
> > > way. Maybe Vinod has an idea.
> >
> > I don't think we need a generic API in this case. The DMA engine is
> > specific to the display device, I don't foresee a need to mix-n-match.
>
> Right. I wonder if there is even a point in using the dmaengine API
> in that case, I think for other single-purpose drivers we tend to just
> integrate the functionality in the client driver. No point changing this
> now of course, but it does feel odd.
I agree, and that's what I would have done as well, if it wasn't for the
fact that the DMA engine also supports a second client for audio. This
isn't supported in upstream yet. We could still have created an ad-hoc
solution, possibly based on the components framework, but the DMA engine
subsystem wasn't a bad fit.
> From my earlier reading of the driver, my impression was that this
> is just a memory-to-memory device, so it could be used that way
> as well, but does need a flag when working on the video memory.
> I couldn't quite make sense of that though.
It's only memory-to-device (video and audio). See figures 33-1 and 33-16
in https://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/user_guides/ug1085-zynq-ultrascale-trm.pdf
> > > /*
> > > * Use the peripheral_config to indicate that the channel is part
> > > * of a video group. This requires matching use of the custom
> > > * structure in each driver.
> > > */
> > > pconfig = config->peripheral_config;
> > > if (WARN_ON(config->peripheral_size != 0 &&
> > > config->peripheral_size != sizeof(*pconfig)))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > How about
> >
> > if (WARN_ON(config->peripheral_config &&
> > config->peripheral_size != sizeof(*pconfig)))
> >
> > >
> > > spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->lock, flags);
> > > if (chan->id <= ZYNQMP_DPDMA_VIDEO2 &&
> > > config->peripheral_size == sizeof(*pconfig))
> >
> > And here you can test pconfig != NULL.
>
> Good idea. Changed now, using 'if (pconfig)' without the '!= NULL'
> in both expressions.
Sounds good to me.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists