[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a16s6dwvb-7REjF-pmnKod2qQRq+mta-g8pDXbQpGQvHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:39:59 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hyun Kwon <hyun.kwon@...inx.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
"open list:TEGRA ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] dmaengine: xilinx_dpdma: stop using slave_id field
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 2:05 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:38:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 12:49 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >
> > Right. I wonder if there is even a point in using the dmaengine API
> > in that case, I think for other single-purpose drivers we tend to just
> > integrate the functionality in the client driver. No point changing this
> > now of course, but it does feel odd.
>
> I agree, and that's what I would have done as well, if it wasn't for the
> fact that the DMA engine also supports a second client for audio. This
> isn't supported in upstream yet. We could still have created an ad-hoc
> solution, possibly based on the components framework, but the DMA engine
> subsystem wasn't a bad fit.
Ah, makes sense. In this case, I guess the data could have been
part of the DMA specifier after all, in a second cell after the
channel number.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists