linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] spi: dw: Replace DWC_HSSI capability with IP-core version checker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:19:28 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Nandhini Srikandan <nandhini.srikandan@...el.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] spi: dw: Replace DWC_HSSI capability with IP-core
 version checker

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 5:08 PM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 04:35:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:30:26AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:

...

> > >  /* DW SPI controller capabilities */
> > >  #define DW_SPI_CAP_CS_OVERRIDE             BIT(0)
> > >  #define DW_SPI_CAP_KEEMBAY_MST             BIT(1)
> > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI                BIT(2)
> > > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32           BIT(3)
> > > +#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32           BIT(2)
>
> > In one patch you move this in the file upper.
> > Here you reshuffling it due to dropping one bit.
> >
> > Now I'm wondering if you may split these two into a separate patch, which
> > brings us to simple
> >
> > -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI          BIT(3)
> >
> > here.
>
> I can change the bit-numbers assignment in the previous patch, which
> moves this block of macros up to the top of the file. Thus we'll
> have just a single
> -#define DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI            BIT(3)
> here. What do you think? Is that what you meant?

I think that reassignment doesn't fit the previous patch per se, hence
I proposed to have yet another one, But in any case it's a minor
thingy.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko