[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZKB3Q1ZMsPD6hHl@google.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:50:53 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: don't use vcpu->arch.efer when
checking host state on nested state load
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> When loading the nested state, due to the way qemu loads
> the nested state, vcpu->arch.efer contains L2' IA32_EFER which
> can be completely different from L1's IA32_EFER, thus it is
> wrong to do consistency check of it vs the vmcs12 exit fields.
This is not sufficient justification. It makes it sound like KVM is hacking
around a bug in its ABI, which it is not, but that fact is _very_ subtle. The
"trust" blurb in bullet (3) in particular is misleading.
Instead, I would like something like:
When loading nested state, don't use check vcpu->arch.efer to get the
L1 host's 64-bit vs. 32-bit state and don't check it for consistency
with respect to VM_EXIT_HOST_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE, as register state in vCPU
may be stale when KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE is called and conceptually does
not exist. When the CPU is in non-root mode, i.e. when restoring L2
state in KVM, there is no snapshot of L1 host state, it is (conditionally)
loaded on VM-Exit. E.g. EFER is either preserved on exit, loaded from the
VMCS (vmcs12 in this case), or loaded from the MSR load list.
Use vmcs12.VM_EXIT_HOST_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE to determine the target mode of
the L1 host, as it is the source of truth in this case. Perform the EFER
vs. vmcs12.VM_EXIT_HOST_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE consistency check only on VM-Enter,
as conceptually there's no "current" L1 EFER to check.
Note, KVM still checks vmcs12.HOST_EFER for consistency if
if vmcs12.VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER is set, i.e. this skips only the check
against current vCPU state, which does not exist, when loading nested state.
> To fix this
>
> 1. Split the host state consistency check
> between current IA32_EFER.LMA and 'host address space' bit in VMCS12 into
> nested_vmx_check_address_state_size.
>
> 2. Call this check only on a normal VM entry, while skipping this call
> on loading the nested state.
>
> 3. Trust the 'host address space' bit to contain correct ia32e
> value on loading the nested state as it is the best value of
> it at that point.
> Still do a consistency check of it vs host_ia32_efer in vmcs12.
>
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index b4ee5e9f9e201..7b1d5510a7cdc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -2866,6 +2866,17 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int nested_vmx_check_address_state_size(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
Bad indentation.
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> + if (CC(!!(vmcs12->vm_exit_controls & VM_EXIT_HOST_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE) !=
> + !!(vcpu->arch.efer & EFER_LMA)))
Bad indentation. The number of !'s is also unnecessary. This also needs a comment
explaining why it's not included in the KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE path.
> + return -EINVAL;
> +#endif
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int nested_vmx_check_host_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
> {
> @@ -2890,18 +2901,16 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_host_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> - ia32e = !!(vcpu->arch.efer & EFER_LMA);
> + ia32e = !!(vmcs12->vm_exit_controls & VM_EXIT_HOST_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE);
> #else
> ia32e = false;
> #endif
>
> if (ia32e) {
> - if (CC(!(vmcs12->vm_exit_controls & VM_EXIT_HOST_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE)) ||
> - CC(!(vmcs12->host_cr4 & X86_CR4_PAE)))
> + if (CC(!(vmcs12->host_cr4 & X86_CR4_PAE)))
> return -EINVAL;
> } else {
> - if (CC(vmcs12->vm_exit_controls & VM_EXIT_HOST_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE) ||
> - CC(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_IA32E_MODE) ||
> + if (CC(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_IA32E_MODE) ||
> CC(vmcs12->host_cr4 & X86_CR4_PCIDE) ||
> CC((vmcs12->host_rip) >> 32))
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -3571,6 +3580,9 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
> if (nested_vmx_check_controls(vcpu, vmcs12))
> return nested_vmx_fail(vcpu, VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD);
>
> + if (nested_vmx_check_address_state_size(vcpu, vmcs12))
> + return nested_vmx_fail(vcpu, VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD);
> +
> if (nested_vmx_check_host_state(vcpu, vmcs12))
> return nested_vmx_fail(vcpu, VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD);
>
> --
> 2.26.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists