linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.14 528/849] selftests/bpf: Fix fd cleanup in sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:00:11 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.14 528/849] selftests/bpf: Fix fd cleanup in sk_lookup test

From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit c3fc706e94f5653def2783ffcd809a38676b7551 ]

Similar to the fix in commit:
e31eec77e4ab ("bpf: selftests: Fix fd cleanup in get_branch_snapshot")

We use designated initializer to set fds to -1 without breaking on
future changes to MAX_SERVER constant denoting the array size.

The particular close(0) occurs on non-reuseport tests, so it can be seen
with -n 115/{2,3} but not 115/4. This can cause problems with future
tests if they depend on BTF fd never being acquired as fd 0, breaking
internal libbpf assumptions.

Fixes: 0ab5539f8584 ("selftests/bpf: Tests for BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach point")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-8-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
index aee41547e7f45..6db07401bc493 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ close:
 
 static void run_lookup_prog(const struct test *t)
 {
-	int server_fds[MAX_SERVERS] = { -1 };
+	int server_fds[] = { [0 ... MAX_SERVERS - 1] = -1 };
 	int client_fd, reuse_conn_fd = -1;
 	struct bpf_link *lookup_link;
 	int i, err;
@@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ static void run_sk_assign(struct test_sk_lookup *skel,
 			  struct bpf_program *lookup_prog,
 			  const char *remote_ip, const char *local_ip)
 {
-	int server_fds[MAX_SERVERS] = { -1 };
+	int server_fds[] = { [0 ... MAX_SERVERS - 1] = -1 };
 	struct bpf_sk_lookup ctx;
 	__u64 server_cookie;
 	int i, err;
-- 
2.33.0