lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 10:22:03 -0800
From:   Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Jue Wang <juew@...gle.com>, Yang Yao <ygyao@...gle.com>,
        Joanna Li <joannali@...gle.com>,
        Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@...gle.com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] hugetlb: Add hugetlb.*.numa_stat file

Subject:   Re: [PATCH v6] hugetlb: Add hugetlb.*.numa_stat file

To:        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>

Cc:        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Jue Wang <juew@...gle.com>, Yang Yao <ygyao@...gle.com>, Joanna Li <joannali@...gle.com>, Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@...gle.com>, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>

Bcc:       

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=# Don't remove this line #=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

On 11/14/21 5:43 AM, Muchun Song wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 3:15 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:

>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 6:48 AM Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com> wrote:

>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:45 PM Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:

>>>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 7:36 AM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote:

>> We have following options:

>>

>> 1) Use atomic type for usage.

>> 2) Use "unsigned long" for usage along with WRITE_ONCE/READ_ONCE.

>> 3) Use hugetlb_lock for hugetlb_cgroup_read_numa_stat as well.

>>

>> All options are valid but we would like to avoid (3).

>>

>> What if we use "unsigned long" type but without READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE.

>> The potential issues with that are KCSAN will report this as race and

>> possible garbage value on archs which do not support atomic writes to

>> unsigned long.

> 

> At least I totally agree with you. Thanks for your detailed explanation.

> 



Thanks everyone.  This makes sense.



However, I should note that this same situation (updates to unsigned

long variables under lock and reads of the the same variable without

lock or READ/WRITE_ONCE) exists in hugetlb sysfs files today.  Not

suggesting that this makes it OK to ignore the potential issue.  Just

wanted to point this out.

-- 

Mike Kravetz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ