[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17d268ba3ce.1199800543649.1713755891767595962@mykernel.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:20:25 +0800
From: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...ernel.net>
To: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>, "Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@...il.com>,
"linux-fsdevel" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"overlayfs" <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 06/10] ovl: implement overlayfs' ->write_inode
operation
---- 在 星期四, 2021-10-07 21:34:19 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> 撰写 ----
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 at 15:10, Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...ernel.net> wrote:
> > > However that wasn't what I was asking about. AFAICS ->write_inode()
> > > won't start write back for dirty pages. Maybe I'm missing something,
> > > but there it looks as if nothing will actually trigger writeback for
> > > dirty pages in upper inode.
> > >
> >
> > Actually, page writeback on upper inode will be triggered by overlayfs ->writepages and
> > overlayfs' ->writepages will be called by vfs writeback function (i.e writeback_sb_inodes).
>
> Right.
>
> But wouldn't it be simpler to do this from ->write_inode()?
>
> I.e. call write_inode_now() as suggested by Jan.
>
> Also could just call mark_inode_dirty() on the overlay inode
> regardless of the dirty flags on the upper inode since it shouldn't
> matter and results in simpler logic.
>
Hi Miklos,
Sorry for delayed response for this, I've been busy with another project.
I agree with your suggesion above and further more how about just mark overlay inode dirty
when it has upper inode? This approach will make marking dirtiness simple enough.
Thanks,
Chengguang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists