linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] cgroup/cpuset: Update description of cpuset.cpus.partition in cgroup-v2.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1426905d-f93a-7500-177b-a8e0fae467ab@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:27:57 -0500
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc:     Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] cgroup/cpuset: Update description of
 cpuset.cpus.partition in cgroup-v2.rst


On 11/15/21 15:11, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 08:31:22PM +0100, Michal Koutný wrote:
>> Now to the constraints and partition setups. I think it's useful to have
>> a model with which the implementation can be compared with.
>> I tried to condense some "simple rules" from the descriptions you posted
>> in v8 plus your response to my remarks in v7 [2]. These should only be
>> the "validity conditions", not "transition conditions".
> FWIW, my opinion is pretty much in line with Michal's in this regard. Other
> than that, everything looks pretty good to me.

Yes, I am going to streamline the documentation as suggested to make it 
easier to understand.

Coding-wise, do you have other changes you want me to make?

Thanks,
Longman