linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: don't generate link-local addr in random or privacy mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211116022145.31322-1-rocco.yue@mediatek.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:21:45 +0800
From:   Rocco Yue <rocco.yue@...iatek.com>
To:     <dsahern@...il.com>
CC:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <Rocco.Yue@...il.com>,
        <chao.song@...iatek.com>, <zhuoliang.zhang@...iatek.com>,
        Rocco Yue <rocco.yue@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: don't generate link-local addr in random or privacy mode

> On Sun, 2021-11-14 at 00:34 +0800, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 11/13/21 1:46 AM, Rocco Yue wrote:
>> 
>> Gentle ping on this patch. :-)
>> 
> 
> you sent the patch in the merge window; I believe it has been dropped
> from patchworks.
>

Hi David,

Thanks for your reply.

Due to I can see this patch from the link below, I'm not sure why this
happened, could you kindly tell me what the merge window is, so I can
avoid such problem next time.
  https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20211113084636.11685-1-rocco.yue@mediatek.com/t/
  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211113084636.11685-1-rocco.yue@mediatek.com/T/

> Also, you did not add v2 (or whatever version this is) with a summary
> of
> changes between all versions, and you did not cc all the people who
> responded to previous versions.
> 

ok, I will resend a patch that meets the above requirements.

Thanks,

Rocco